This website works best with JavaScript enabled. Learn how to enable JavaScript.

VWO Blog

A Blog Around Everything Conversion Optimization And Beyond

Never miss an update from VWO

A value for this field is required.

The Battle between Short and Long Pages Continues. Guess which Scored a Point.

I think I should make a series of all the A/B tests that I have personally come across in which removing a certain element worked for one company, and adding that same element worked for another. (To understand what I mean by element, you should read this post.) After all, every business is different. And so are their target audiences.

Few months back, I came across this wonderful test in which an SEO company went from a content rich page to one with only a form and headline texts, and improved their conversions. I was intrigued, and curious to know the science behind why such pages work, and why even giants like Facebook, LinkedIn and Quora have bare minimum homepages. I have added my findings about why they work, and what the challenges of such a page could be in the same post. Do give it a read.

In fact, we, at VWO, were so inspired by this test that we decided to give it a shot. And hey, have you checked our homepage recently? And may I add, it’s working well for us as well.

For today’s case study, I have a test the bang opposite of this!

The Company

PayPanther is an all-in-one solution for free Online Invoicing, CRM, Time Tracking, & Project Management software for freelancers & businesses.

The Test

PayPanther wanted to test between a long and a short version of the ‘pricing and signup’ page. The first time they made this page, they believed that a shorter page would drive more signups as there would be lesser distraction and content to read. In this test, they setup the original page to be pitted against a page which had 3 more sections: FAQs about pricing, testimonials, and another call to action button asking people to sign up.

This is how the original looked like:


And this is how the new page looked:


The test was run for a month on about 1000 visitors and the variation, containing FAQs and testimonials, won! It recorded an increase of 372.62% in signups.

Thrilled by the results, PayPanther has implemented this longer page as their default “pricing and signup” page. They even plan to do further tests to find out the most optimum headlines and button texts.

Why the Variation Won?

  1. The FAQs section answered the common doubts and concerns the website visitors had. It, thus, created a sense of credibility and trust.
  2. Adding testimonials work, always. I am yet to see a test in which adding testimonials hurt conversions. You can look at this, this, and this case study for examples. Of course, they have their own rules and to use them effectively, I suggest you read this excellent post to get the most benefit from testimonials.

Let’s Talk!

Tell me know what you think about this case study. Have a similar test that you did on one of your webpages? Let’s talk about it in the comments section below.

Spread the awesomeness by sharing this post with your network on Twitter, Facebook and LinkedIn.

Taruna is a Marketer at Visual Website Optimizer. She takes care of paid campaigns and is constantly on a search for interesting ways to promote VWO.

Comments (6)

Leave a Comment
  1. Really interesting case study guys and no surprise that short pages are outperforming long pages when it comes to conversion. However this causes a dilemma for SEOs and sets them up in opposition against CROs, as Google continues to rank in-depth content higher, often at the expense of priority (conversion) pages on the same site.

    This issue leads to an information architecture challenge, where the long-form ‘resource’ page is pushed further down the hierarchy of the site to illustrate its priority to Google, or what is even more effective – optimising the conversion cycle so that the customer is guided down the buying funnel from search landing page (resource page) to conversion page.

  2. You made a very valid point Matt. Even from CRO’s perspective there are some problems with shorter pages like the lead quality entering in your database and lack of credibility for new visitors — they don’t have much of content to read and understand about you and your business.

    I think the brand name here plays a very important role and big brands can get away with having shorter pages and they needn’t worry about the SEO part either as they have already been recognized by Google and continue to rank on top.

  3. The shorter one was too short. I think a page should have some extra things on page in addition to a call to action. The extra things should be used to prove your point just like the longer page example here.

  4. I guess this issue is much more simple than it might look like. Copy MUST be long. Why? Coz it’s all about persuasion, the longer you convince your client the bigger chance you get to convert him.
    However lead page MUST be as shot and as simple as humanly possible. In order not to distract new lead.

  5. In this instance I would surely say that the variation worked because it provided more context around the product and the product’s proposition. Yes, the FAQs dealt with paint points but by providing more (of the right, salient) information the user will undoubtedly reduce their commitment to purchase which is a barrier. Great example though, nice read.

Leave Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes : <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Contact Us / Login