VWO Testing

Leverage Data-driven Experimentation to Win In the Subscription Economy

Run research-backed A/B tests across your prospects and users' lifecycle to optimize metrics that matter: from free trial to purchase, and beyond.

Know More
VWO GDPR Ready Badge
VWO CCPA Ready Badge
VWO G2Crowd Leader Spring Badge
VWO BS 10012 Certification Badge
SOC 2 logo
Follow us and stay on top of everything CRO

How pricing plans evolved over time for a SaaS startup

7 Min Read

We are in the process of finalizing pricing for my startup VWO, which is an A/B and Multivariate testing tool. As you can imagine, fixing the price is one of the toughest decisions that a startup has to (inevitably) take. Once fixed, it could be extremely difficult to change it without annoying a lot of customers. We want to be extra sure that we don’t end up under or over-pricing VWO. So, how do we decide what to charge?

Asking beta users can be one of the strategies and we actually used that for VWO. However, it turned out to be not the best of our ideas because users actually correlate price with quality. Further, if a product is innovative (like VWO is), users aren’t able to rationally determine its price as they would in established markets. Hence, asking users what a new product should cost yields half-baked information as they have little or no reference points to determine the ideal price.

Download Free: A/B Testing Guide

a reference cartoon to explain the concept

Another way to determine price is, of course, to look at what competitors charge. In the world of A/B testing, there is a lot of variation. While Google’s basic testing tool is free, Omniture and Webtrends solutions easily run into thousands of dollars per month. To be sure, VWO is not competing head-to-head with a free a/b testing tool – it is a sure-shot way to death for any startup. We are actually competing with pricey tools, at least in terms of functionality. In fact, our users’ feedback confirms our hypothesis that VWO is much better than any other A/B testing tool in the world. Does that mean, like enterprise tools, we should also charge thousands of dollars per month?

So, here we are: still undecided about the pricing. We don’t want to charge too high, nor do we want to charge too less. To get better insights into pricing, I decided to research if there had been a successful startup in a complementary industry that was in a similar position. I was lucky enough to find Clicktale, a company that provides heatmaps and usability testing tools. Thanks to Archive.org, a great way to trace their progress over the years is to look at their website and pricing evolution over time. (Note: I don’t have any insider information about their company nor I am affiliated with Clicktale in any manner. All material that I have used for research is publically available on the Internet).

The Story

Clicktale started in May 2006 as a closed alpha. Within a month, they quickly transitioned to beta and did not exit from beta until May 2007 (a full year in beta). However, they still remained invited only till July 2007. Within this beta period, they started taking feedback from their users on what they could pay for the tool. Read the thread titled ‘Pricing for Clicktale’ on their forum (dated Feb 14, 2007). Every reply on this thread is a must-read, however, the poll results summarize their users’ feedback on pricing:

the poll on the type of service plan to be used

All startups in the beta take note from the poll above – chances are that more than half your beta users won’t like to pay for your product. In our survey too, many of VWO users either did not want to pay or wanted to pay a very small amount $9 or $15 per month.

In the forum thread above, two contrasting opinions are interesting:

One user thought that higher pricing is justified as the tool is a direct value addition to the business. He also rightly pointed out that the target market is online business owners, who are already conditioned to pay for services. To quote him from the thread:

So $99 is really low priced. If someone cannot take the $99 or even the $49 ClickTale product, and use the information to at least create a positive ROI every month, they probably do not need the product in the first place.

Then there is a user who thought $49 was too pricey for him and $19 was too limited. He compared the offering with Google Analytics, which is free. To quote him from the thread:

As to Adam’s comments [the user who argued $99/month was fine] about pricing, I think he and I are not operating in the same world.. I use Analytics for free, and am paying $19/month for crazyegg. I don’t use enterprise-price-level solutions and I think probably a lot of your customers don’t either.. If you are going to be in the enterprise world, just hire a ton of people for sales & support and quadruple your prices..

This contrast is super-interesting to us because, like them, we are in exact same dilemma – which market to cater to? Do we cater to small/medium and enterprise sized businesses who can pay for the service? Or do we cater to a long tail of freelancers or tiny businesses who want the service for free or at an extremely low cost? As a startup, the decision of identifying target market pretty much determines our survival. A no-brainer: price it too high and we don’t get enough customers. Price it too low and we don’t get enough revenue to cover costs.

Download Free: A/B Testing Guide

The Evolution

Clicktale was finally launched to the public in August, 2007. Their pricing at the launch time is interesting:

the evolution of the pricing plans for Clicktale

The pricing is the same as they had proposed in the forum, however, interestingly they increased the page recordings per month (the limiting factor for different accounts) by 5x. In the forum post, they proposed 80 recordings/month for a free account, while on launch they increased it to 400/month. This tells they listened to feedback from their users carefully and incorporated it into their final pricing. Take note of that, startups.

In December 2007 (about 1.5 years after they launched Alpha), they secured venture capital and the pricing of their product remained the same for the next 7 months. In August 2008, they bifurcated pricing plans into personal and business editions. In personal plans, they offered a super-cheap plan of $9/month (10 times cheaper than the existing $99 plan):

pricing table for the personal plans

And for the business edition, they introduced a super-expensive plan of $999/month (10 times costlier than the existing $99 plan):

pricing table for the business edition

Unfortunately, Archive.org does not have any entry of their website after August 2008. I searched on Google to get a hint of what happened to their pricing after they launched personal and business plans. The latest change in pricing that I was able to track down is in Feb 2009. A blog post reviewing them reproduced their pricing chart:

snapshot of the pricing chart on the blog

You can see they dropped the bifurcation of plans and decreased the number of choices significantly. They also dropped cheaper plans ($9, $49) and some expensive ones too ($490, $990). They have exact same pricing even today (as of April 2010).


The reason I invested time doing all this research is to help startups such as mine make an informed decision on how to price their products. It is not very obvious that a successful company such as Clicktale, within 2 years, transforms the highest-priced plan at the time of launch into its lowest-priced plan today. They tried all sorts of pricing plans and apparently found that businesses which use their service value it enough to pay at least $99/month.

As a startup about to get out of beta, what I read from this is that if you provide a product that your user’s value, don’t fall into the trap of selling it at rock-bottom prices (in hopes of compensating it for a large volume of users). Another lesson that I take from this evolution is that it is OK to change pricing if your current plans don’t turn out to be ideal.

If you have any feedback, comments, or thoughts, please share them with me. I hope you enjoyed my investigative journalism 🙂

Note: The author owns the screenshots used in the blog.

Paras Chopra
Paras Chopra I started Wingify in early 2009 to enable businesses to design and deploy great customer experiences for their websites and apps. I have a background in machine learning and am a gold medalist from Delhi College of Engineering. I have been featured twice in the Forbes 30 under 30 list - India and Asia. I'm an entrepreneur by profession and my curiosity is wide-ranging. Follow me at @paraschopra on Twitter. You can email me at paras@wingify.com
Related content
More from VWO on Customer Engagement
The Art of Being Stupid – Why Testing Matters More Than Everything Else

The Art of Being Stupid – Why Testing Matters More Than Everything Else

Note: This is a guest article written by Tyler Hakes, the strategy director at Optimist,…

Read More
Tyler Hakes

Tyler Hakes

7 Min Read
Proof of how important website titles are for SEO

Proof of how important website titles are for SEO

On popular forum Hacker News, there were recent discussions on how important website titles are…

Read More
Paras Chopra

Paras Chopra

1 Min Read
CMOs are Becoming CROs: How to Integrate Marketing and Sales to Actually Drive Revenue

CMOs are Becoming CROs: How to Integrate Marketing and Sales to Actually Drive Revenue

Note: This is a guest article written by David Zheng, the Founder of GrowthWit and…

Read More
David Zheng

David Zheng

12 Min Read

Scale your A/B testing and experimentation with VWO.

Start Free Trial Request Demo